Last time | Next time |
This gives us a (somewhat biased) picture of the lead situation throughout Newport, although multiple samples were taken from individual properties (and we're not sure how they were selected -- suspected hot? suspected cold?).
Surveys Forms 23, 24, 43 (W or X); and Form 27, which appears to be from Covington.
(A1 Provide (A2 Safe (A3 Eat/Ex (A4 Someone (A5 Community (A6 Hope (B Age (C Gender (D Newport All: (((a d sd sa) (26 4 5 18)) ((a d sa sd) (32 8 11 2)) ((a d sa sd) (32 11 8 2)) ((d a sa sd) (3 21 26 3)) ((a d sd sa x) (30 15 3 4 1)) ((a d sa x sd) (24 3 24 1 1)) ((50 31 16 15) (13 21 14 5)) ((m f x) (21 28 4)) ((w e x) (25 21 7))) Westside: (((a d sa sd) (16 3 5 1)) ((a d sa sd) (15 5 4 1)) ((a d sa sd) (16 6 2 1)) ((d a sa sd) (1 12 11 1)) ((a d sd sa) (11 7 3 4)) ((a d sa sd) (13 2 9 1)) ((50 31 16 15) (4 11 7 3)) ((m f x) (11 13 1)) ((w) (25))) Eastside: (((d sd sa a) (1 3 10 7)) ((d a sd sa) (3 11 1 6)) ((a d sa sd) (12 3 5 1)) ((a d sa sd) (5 1 14 1)) ((d a) (7 14)) ((d a sa x) (1 8 11 1)) ((16 31 50 15) (4 10 6 1)) ((f m x) (12 8 1)) ((e) (21))
A "Z table"
This report contains a couple of graphs which show off the data values, the way I would like to for our data. Some quotes from their study:
But there are other things to talk about from that study.
It motivated another class in the Project Hope initiative, of which Emily Keener was a member to write the following report. Emily Keener was kind enough to tip me off to the existence of the Superfund report.
One of the students on this project went on to write the Enquirer article which just came out.
We're using the KY EPA lead data to
In the end, we get results that look like these.