Examined the preview exercise graphically, to see how inverse
functions are related graphically: their graphs are reflections about
the line .
We discussed domains and ranges of inverses -- that, in general,
they're different -- and that it might be best to express the
relationship between them this way: if and are inverses,
then
but
Elements of one set (values ) are transported to another set
(values ), by ; then takes them back home.
Meanwhile, elements of one set (values ) are transported to
another set (values ), by ; then takes them back
home.
We talked about how it's necessary in some cases to restrict the
domain of a function before one will be able to invert it:
But that it's so important to be able to invert some functions we will
do it, and then figure out the issues later (e.g. did we actually want
the negative answer to "What's the square root of 4?").
For example, in the quadratic formula you know that there's a
: we need both solutions that we get from the square
root!
Then we saw how the chain rule can be used to find the derivative of
an inverse function (it's a composition!):
We studied a most important example: the inverse function of
: we'll call it . The function
is, in fact, invertible -- no need to restrict a domain!
Notice the two different sets that the functions transfer elements
between:
Now how about its derivative? For , --
easy!
So
becomes
Amazing! This is the "missing power" -- we didn't know how to get this
particular derivative using the power rule (It would have come from
the power -- but that's a constant, so it's derivative is
0. This creates a mysterious connection between powers and the
exponential function, and its inverse, the logarithm.)
A number of you have forgotten the quotient rule (and used
the unfortunately easy misquotient rule). You don't
have to use the quotient rule, however, as I point
out on the "Your key" above.
You do have to get it right, however!:)
Now, for more about that derivative of :
Notice that the derivative's graph is our friend the
hyperbola. Notice also that this function is odd -- it should be
the derivative of an even function. We can extend the function
to the left, by considering :
By the way, this allows us to now clearly understand those
derivatives of other exponential functions. Consider, for example, the
function
Because we now have the inverse function of , we can write
-- more generally we need to remember that, as
inverses, -- at least for positive values of
. And, last I checked, 2 is positive:
That might look a little scary, but is just a number --
approximately 0.69. So we can now compute the derivative of
easily, thinking of it as a composition -- and so using the chain rule:
More generally, if ,
And the choice of gives that amazing function that satisfies
Just as before, but once again we have to restrict the domain:
sine is not invertible. We have a choice, but it seems like the best
place to think of sine as invertible is on the interval :
The inverse of sine is called arcsine, but note that we
will sometimes denote the inverse as
. Let
and
We use the inverse derivative rule to find the derivative of
arcsine.
Now how about its derivative? For ,
-- still easy, which in this case gives
But this time it will be a little more unpleasant to
simplify that denominator (). There's a trick you know,
however: we can rewrite cosine in terms of sine, using our most
important trig identity:
so
(Notice that we need both !) Hence
becomes (remember that sine and arcsine undo each other, to give !)
where you will notice that I chose the positive "branch". Why?