Last time | Next time |
Today:
For most of you, this was your lowest test score. But a few of you did well.
That puts more pressure on the final, but it allows us to essentially eliminate the impact of this exam, if you make improvement down the road.
Now: how to do that?
You might have noticed that the fourth problem on the exam was covered in its entirety the Friday before the exam. I thought that it would be fun to see who followed along.
5 of you got it correct; 12 out of 22 received a 50% or below.
Take notes, then review the notes before an exam.
This one's a killer, and several of you fall victim to it. I've seen it time and again this semester. You've got to get this out of your system, because it's sand in your gears.
Also, being given the fact that the tangent line passed through the point (1,-4), some of you didn't plot THIS point! It's on both the circle and the tangent line. Seems like you'd want to graph that point -- it's pretty important!
And if your tangent line doesn't go through that point? Comment on that fact. Let me know that you know that you've made a mistake -- even if you can't find it.
Then label your graph.
You need to have a reservoir of mathematics facts at your fingertips. Another on this exam was the equation of a circle.
I've emphasized the importance of knowing classes of functions (polynomials, rational, trig, etc.); you also need to have some basic mathematical facts at your fingertips.
So now we know how to handle closed, bounded intervals; now let's talk about what happens when we let $x$ become unbounded. How will a function behave as $x$ races off to $\infty$ or $-\infty$?
Another example with a horizontal asymptote is knowledge as a function of time -- #51, p. 222. We might guess that accumulated knowledge in studying for an exam looks something like this:
We might imagine that this physical process becomes less productive from hour to hour as the evening wears on (the law of diminishing returns).
Other Examples:
More generally, If $r>0$ is a rational number, then
then if the degree of q exceeds that of p, there is a horizontal asymptote, and the value of the asymptote is given by examining the approximating function given by the ratio of leading terms alone.
This is called a "slant asymptote" (not a horizontal asymptote, for obvious reasons! If you get far from the origin, then the difference between the two functions falls away.
We can then replace the more complicated with the simpler.
We use this idea in physics all the time: we assume that gravity is constant at the surface of the Earth. In fact, it varies as distance to the center of the Earth, but we're so far away that we can take this as a constant (its value at about 4000 miles -- our distance to the center of the Earth). We're far enough from the origin (the center of the Earth) that we treat acceleration due to gravity as locally constant.
We can say, however, that $\infty*\infty=\infty$, that $\infty*1=\infty$, that $\infty/1=\infty$, etc. So some of the usual rules apply (and hopefully make sense!).
where $k$ is the spring constant (characteristic of the particular spring). Newton said that
If we put those two laws together, we get
For initial conditions, we should give initial position and initial velocity.
The acceleration due to gravity at the earth's surface is often taken as approximately
where the minus sign indicates that gravity's inclination is to make your height decrease (to 0 at the center of the earth, if gravity could).
Your force on the earth (or the earth's force on you!) is your weight, $m g$.
Since
If height is given by $h(t)$, then
or
Once again, we should give initial position and initial velocity.
Now you ask yourself this: do I know a function whose second derivative is a constant? And the answer is YES! -- a quadratic function. The specific quadratic function is
(Check and make sure!). Then, once you've specified $h_0$ and $v_0$, the motion of the projectile is fully determined.