SHIML & zGraphViewer - example 


Simple vacancy diffusion mechanism in L12-structured compounds

Background

One of the first applications of SHIML (or rather a developmental version of SHIML) was the simulation of spectra from perturbed angular correlation spectroscopy (PAC) for the special case of non-impurity PAC probes on the Cu-sublattice of Cu3Au- (or L12-) structured compounds [34].  In the context of the 5-frequency model, a vacancy that starts in a first neighbor Cu position next to a PAC probe on a Cu site can experience three different jump rates (before making the assumption that the PAC probe is a host element).  A vacancy starting in a second neighbor position to the probe can jump to a first neighbor position with a fourth jump rate.  The four types of jumps are labeled according to their jump frequencies, w 1, w 2, w 3, and w 4 in the figure to the right (Cu atoms in black and Au in white).  When the PAC probe is a host element (Cu in Cu3Au), then all four jump frequencies are equal w1= w2= w3= w4 = w.

A hyperfine without a nearby vacancy experiences an axially symmetric electric field gradient (EFG), which arises because of the non-cubic point symmetry at the Cu-site.  The EFG's symmetry axis at a particular Cu site is perpendicular to the plane formed by the nearest neighbor Au atoms, and there are three possible Cu-sites, labeled 1, 2, and 3 in the figure, corresponding to the possible directions of the symmetry axis.  The symmetry of the EFG that a probe experiences is reduced further when a vacancy is located near the probe.  The disturbance to the EFG falls off as 1/r 3, and in the simulations below, it is assumed for simplicity that only vacancies in first neighbor positions to the probe will have a non-negligble effect.  In addition, it will be assumed that the vacancy concentration is small enough that at most one vacancy will be located next to the probe.  Under these assumptions, there are 15 possible EFGs that probes can experience: 3 due to each Cu site's defect-free environment and 12 with a near neighbor vacancy (4 for each Cu site).  Illustrations of the sources of two EFGs are shown below.

Under the assumptions made above, it is possible to reduce the number of parameters in the simulations to just 3: w, the jump rate of Cu-vacancies; [V], the concentration of Cu-vacancies; and g, the ratio of the strength of EFG created by a vacancy-only to the strength of the defect-free lattice EFG.  It is convenient to scale all EFG interaction frequencies and the jump rate w by the quadrupole interaction frequency of the defect-free lattice, wQ.  In the plot below, time also is scaled by wQ.  Discussion of the results can be found in the article by Muhammed, Zacate, and Evenson [34].    

Visualization of results in zGraphViewer

zGraphViewer is a JAVA applet to view low-resolution graphs of simulation results generated when varying one or more parameters.  If a JAVA plug-in is available on the browser currently in use, the results of simulations described above should appear below.  Simulation results are shown for a range in vacancy jump rates of 10-3wQ to 10+6wQ , a range in concentration of 0.0004 to 0.04, and a range of EFG strength ratios from 0.0 (the unlikely limit of no disturbance caused by vacancies) to 2.0.  Move the sliders or click on arrows to change values of simulation parameters.  Clicking the "Freeze Image" button will keep the curve currently displayed on the plot as a reference in order to allow the user to compare it with spectra with different parameters.  Clicking the "Unfreeze Image" button will remove the reference spectrum.

Acknowledgements

This work is funded in part by NSF grant DMR 06-06006 (Metals Program).


Back to the zGraphViewer or the SHIML page
Home Page of Matthew Zacate
Department of Physics and Geology
Northern Kentucky University

Page last updated in September of 2009. 
Material on this page does not necessarily reflect the views of the acknowledged funding agencies and of Northern Kentucky University (disclaimer).  Indeed, if something is found to be controversial, it may not necessarily reflect the views of the author.  Copyright (C) 2009 Matthew O. Zacate.