No. 243  April 2003

BIOMETRICS AND FACIAL RECOGNITION SECURITY SYSTEMS  The USA Patriot Act of 2001 and the Enhanced Border Security Act are the legal reasons why the National Institute of Science and Technology (NIST) guide private industry to develop biometric identification systems for use at U. S. Border exit-entry locations.  The research, accomplishments, innovations, resulting databases, standards, and recommendations in the area of facial recognitions, mug shots, and fingerprint identification standards are topics covered in the long list of NIST Internal Reports and Publications found on the NIST Image Group web page (http://www.itl.nist.gov/iad/894.03/face/face.html).  Historically, people have been identified by their fingerprints, but now there is technology for facial recognition. Recently ten facial recognition systems were tested on the State Department of State database of 121000 images of 37,000 individuals.  There were tests conducted in 2000 and 2002 and the databases of information about both tests are now available. Currently, the latest Face Recognition Vendor Test 2002 (FRVT) results are in three parts. The Overview and Summary is a good introduction to the Evaluation Report and the Technical Appendices (all of which) makeup the full report. Both the 2000 and the 2002 Reports will be found as pdf files on the NIST Image Group page. The FRVT research group also has its own website (http://www.frvt.org/ ) for direct access to these reports.  

DISASTERS HISTORY 1900-1993 What countries have experienced mud slides? Volcanoes? What is the Disaster Mud slide for Ecuador? How does Japan compare to India in terms of economic losses and loss of life due to floods and earthquakes?  Disaster History: significant data on major disasters worldwide, 1900- present was issued in August 1993 by the Agency for International Development’s, Office of Foreign Disaster Assistance (OFDA). The 231 paged text, which excludes the United States, is arranged alphabetically by country, chronologically lists the disaster information entries. Each entry includes the disaster date and type, the number of victims (killed, affected, and rendered homeless), and the estimated cost of damage.   Civil strife disasters are included only if the U.S. Government provided relief aid. Also included are all OFDA “declared disasters” which mandate a U.S. Government and aid, and significant “non-declared” disasters. Non-declared disasters include most earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, weather disasters, drought disasters, and accidents if they meet the property damage, life loss, and economic impact limits of the OFDA guidelines.  This report is found as a pdf file http://www.dec.org/pdf_docs/PNABP986.pdf  in the U. S. Agency for International Development’s Development Experience Clearinghouse (DEC) webpage at http://www.dec.org/default.cfm.  Actually, a search for Natural Disasters on the Search USAID Rpts page http://www.dec.org/search/dexs/index.cfm?fuseaction=search.field.dexs  will identify three editions of this title all of which can be ordered in a microfiche or paper format.  

EXECUTION BY STONING  Did you hear the news? A woman was sentenced to death for having a child out of wedlock? She was sentenced to be buried up to her neck in sand and stoned to death.  Does this sound extreme? In the United States, the practice of being stoned to death for a crime ended with America’s colonial era. Currently in countries such as Nigeria, Iran , and Afghanistan women have been sentenced to death by stoning when accused of adultery, prostitution, or raped. It was in March, 2002 that Amina Lawal, a 31 year old Nigerian single mother was sentenced to death by stoning for having sex outside of marriage. Other than the newspapers and the Internet, which provide current details, the State Department’s Country Reports on Human Rights Practices, (http://www.state.gov/g/drl/hr/c1470.htm) and Trafficking in Persons Reports (http://www.state.gov/g/tip/rls/tiprpt/ ) will document these lethal stoning activities.  There is a 24 page  July 25, 2002 Congressional House Committee on International Relations hearing, Expressing the sense of Congress that the United States should condemn the practice of execution by stoning as a gross violation of human rights, and for  other purposes, and calling for an end to the sexual exploitation of refugees, Markup….H.Con.Res. 351 and H.Con. Res. 349.  Issued as Serial No. 107-103, it is available in some libraries (Y 4.IN 8/16:C76/7) and on the Committee’s website at http://wwwa.house.gov/international_relations/107/iohr107.htm   as html and pdf files.

DOG BITES Even though your dog may not hurt “the proverbial flea,” hurting a flea would be a minor event. The Center for Disease Control and Prevention’s website version of its Injury Fact Book 2001-2002 includes statistics about dog bites. It seems that “every 40 seconds, in the United States seeks medical attention for a dog bite--related injury.” Also, “during 1979-1998, dog attacks killed more than 300 Americans, and of the nearly 800,000 people who sought medical help for dog bites in 1994, half of them were children under 18.” “Pit bull-type dogs and Rottweilers were involved in more than half the deaths for which the breed of the dog was known.” The Dog Bite Injuries page of the CDC’s National Center for Injury Prevention and Control presents the problem http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/fact_book/14_Dog_Bite_Injuries.htm and then provides a nine item comprehensive bibliography NCIPI Bibliography on Articles on Dog Bites http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/duip/dogbites.htm    (in pdf files) providing extensive background information and documentation on the research and  statistics of dog bite injuries. These web pages complement the NCIPC’s announcement of Dog Bite Prevention Week and the related NCIPC Programs and Activities (http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/duip/biteprevention.htm ). Most informative, but lacking from the bibliography is John C. Wright’s “Severe Attacks by Dogs,  Characteristics of the Dogs, Victims, and the Attack Settings,” Public Health Reports  v. 100, No. 1, January 1985, pages 55-61 (HE 20.30.20:100/1).  

MAPMAKING & INJURY-RELATED MORTALITY STATISTICS Released to the public on April 14, 1997, the Atlas of United States Mortality is the first to show all leading causes of death by race and sex for small U.S. geographic areas referred to as Health Service Areas (HSA's). The 18 causes of death included in this atlas however do not reflect the mortality data at the county and State level. The Atlas is available in paper, CD-ROM, and on the NCHS website (http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/pubs/pubd/other/atlas/atlas.htm ). However the Health Service Area data of the Atlas is limited because it does not reflect and does not coincide with counties or county geography. Overcoming the limitations and updating the Atlas is the National Center for Injury Prevention and Control’s Injury Maps interactive web site. “Injury Maps, CDC Injury Center ’s interactive mapping system, gives you access to the geographic distribution of injury related mortality rates in the United States.   Injury Maps allows you to create county-level and state-level maps of adjusted mortality rates for the entire United States and for individual States. For the beginning mapmaker, Injury Maps has a Begin Tutorial link which leads the user through the mapmaking process of  selecting  the “Cause of Death,” “State,” “Period of Interest (i.e. Dates),” and “Colors” options to create a National or State map with State/County statistics. As of June, 2003, there will be nine causes of (injury-related) mortality to use in one’s creating a “State Injury Mortality Rate Map” which is printable per the included Injury Maps’ instructions. The Injury Maps page also provides links to four additional injury data sources of injury data  annual injury publications, injury databases,  interactive injury databases, and online data maps.

TO THE SHORES OF TRIPOLY, U.S. MILITARY SENT ABROAD It is April and the United States is about to liberate Iraq . It is 2003 and the latest instance when the United States is using its military might and  armed forces in a foreign land for other than peaceful purposes.  In 1789, in an undeclared war with France , the United States sent Marines were sent to the Dominican Republic to capture a French Privateer. In 1801, the Marines were used to rescue the crew of the USS Philadelphia held in captivity in Tripoli ( Africa ). From 1798 to 1993, there have been five undeclared wars, the Barbary Coast Wars 1801-1805 and 1815, the Korean War 1950-1953, the Vietnam War 1964-1973, and the Persian Gulf War 1990-1991. However, these are not among  a new “report which lists 234 instances in which the United States has used its armed forces abroad in situations of conflict or potential conflict or for other than normal peacetime purposes.” The Naval Historical Center has put in its website a most interesting bit of military history and chronology of how often and exactly when the U.S. has flexed its military muscles in other countries. Instances of Use of United States Forces Abroad, 1798-1993 was compiled by Ellen C. Collier from a Congressional Committee source and from a Congressional Record list.  Collier’s three footnotes at the end of the list reflect further sources used to compile this list, other lists, the evolution of such lists, and the War Powers Resolution issues. This lengthy (22 pages when printed) list is found at   http://www.history.navy.mil/wars/foabroad.htm.  

VALUE OF LIFE: ELDERLY SHORT-CHANGED Safety regulations passed by the EPA and other agencies are intended to save lives. In regard to all Regulations passed, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) is committed to the principle of calculating how many years of life would be added to individuals by enacting a regulation.  What is the value of life?, how is it calculated?, and are “all lives equal?  The OMB and its Federal Regulations calculates the dollar cost(s) on the lives of the people they save.  OMB then compares the cost of the lives (i.e. the benefits) to the costs to be paid by the industry (i.e. the costs) of implementing the regulation. The Regulation’s benefits, to the people, should outweigh its costs to industry.  It was recently revealed that the Clinton administration was using what some critics called a “senior death discount.” The Clinton administration considered the people under 70 to be more valuable than the people over 70 years of age.  The life of the aged was valued at 37 percent less than a younger person; the life of the aged person was worth $ 2.3 million instead of $ 3.7 million, which was the value of younger people.  On May 30, 2003 , a Memorandum to the President’s Management Council, Benefit-Cost and Lifesaving Rules, John D. Graham stated “In light of these developments, I advised EPA to discontinue use of this factor as an adjustment to the economic value of a statistical life (VSL). The VSL would thus be the same for all ages of people. I am also advising analysts at other agencies that such a factor should not be used in VSL analysis.” The Memorandum is as a pdf file at http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/inforeg/pmc_benefit_cost_memo.pdf    that is on the OMB Regulatory Matters web page http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/inforeg/regpol.html.  

COST AND BENEFITS 2003 As of  February 3, 2003, the OMB’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs has made the latest report of the what the Regulations costs and benefits for the Regulations issued between October 1, 2001 and September 31, 2002.  At the top of the list of reports found at OIRA Reports to Congress website (http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/inforeg/regpol-reports_congress.html) is the Draft 2003 Report to Congress on the Costs and Benefits of Federal Regulations (February 3, 2003). This report which appeared as a Notice in the Federal Register, V. 68, No. 22, February 3, 2003 , pages 5491-5527 and is found as a pdf file at http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/fedreg/2003draft_cost-benefit_rpt.pdf .  These 37 pages will provide cost and benefits facts and figures which the public will read, review, and send comments to OMB which will then issue a Final version of the Report at a later date.         

FOOD DEFECTS/CONTAMINANTS: LEGAL/ILLEGAL LEVELS  What is worse than finding a worm in your apple?  Answer: Half of a worm.  What and where is the perfect food or foods? Those grown in one’s garden. You grow perfect food commodities free of any internal or foreign food defect.  In agriculture, where there are poor food growing, processing, or manufacturing processes, the results are food defects.  Regardless of the defect level, these food products are unlawful are subject to FDA regulatory action. However, most of America’s food supply is a result of mass agricultural production; where, even with the best methods and goals,  it is economically impractical to grow, harvest, or process raw food products that are totally  free of non-hazardous, naturally occurring, unavoidable defects. Title 21, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 110.110 allows the Food and Drug Administration to establish maximum levels of natural or unavoidable defects in foods for humans that present no health hazard.  These “Food Defect Action Levels” listed in The Food Defect Action Levels, Levels of natural or unavoidable defects in foods that present no health hazards for humans, (Revised May 1998)  http://vm.cfsan.fda.gov/~dms/dalbook.html    are set on the premise--they pose no inherent hazard to health.” Food products which contain defect levels above those set in this list are considered adulterated foods, and are subject to enforcement actions under the current FDA adulterated food law. This manual, which is about 32 pages, consists of 7 parts which include a Glossary of all the terms which relate to the Defects found in food commodities, and an alphabetical listing of all the food commodities, their specific natural or unavoidable defect(s) identified, and the acceptable defect action level for that commodity. Any time the FDA reviews and changes the defect action levels on this list, or adds products and their defect action levels to this list, these revisions are published as Notices in the Federal Register.  The natural or unavoidable defects found within sample quantities of each of the food commodities listed include a variety of molds, insects, rots, insect filths, rodent filths, shells, and bean grade defects.

 Back to Philip’s Page

August 8, 2003

http://www.nku.edu/~yannarella/news0304.html