| The "Alignment Planning Toolkit" is a resource to
assist in your planning efforts. The toolkit will be updated
periodically as additional issues come to our attention and as new
information becomes available. We hope you find these resources
beneficial as you work to finalize your plans. Please let us know
if you have any questions or would like additional information.
FAQs
Alignment Planning Process
2007-2010
Q: What is unit alignment planning?
A: Unit alignment planning is a
mechanism for linking our human, financial and physical resources with
the priorities articulated in
The Talent Imperative! Unit
alignment plans are not operational plans and thus, should not include
current or on-going activities. Instead, the plans should focus on new
or modified activities (i.e., Priorities for Action) proposed for
2007-08, 2008-09, and 2009-10 that directly relate to the
university-wide strategic agenda.
Q: What are the primary
components of unit alignment planning?
A: (1) Mission Statement: How does
the unit support the NKU mission?
(2) Priorities
for Action (PFA): What are the specific actions the unit shall undertake
to accomplish the university-wide priorities articulated in The
Talent Imperative?
(3) Measurable
Desirable Outcomes: What are the expected results in quantifiable terms?
(4) Assessment
Methods: How will progress and results be determined? Who is responsible
for collecting the data?
(5) Additional
Funding Requirements: Are new resources required over the planning
period?
Q: What is the relationship
between unit alignment plans and budget requests?
A: Unit plans will help to
streamline the budget process, but do not constitute a formal budget
request or commitment. The goal is to make the budgeting process more
efficient for units and divisions by integrating these processes into a
seamless system. Unit alignment plans will be incorporated into the
development of the 2008-09 and the 2009-10 operating budgets and
subsequently be continued on a 2-year cycle to correlate with the
biennial budget.
Funding requirements reported in the unit
alignment plan should include estimated levels of funding for only those
Priorities for Action that require new or additional funding. Detailed
budget information will be required in the operating budget request, but
not in the alignment planning materials.
Q: Should each unit work
independently to develop the unit alignment plan?
A: No. The development and
implementation of unit alignment plans must be a collaborative process
across divisions to the fullest extent possible. The development of
Priorities for Action should include an examination of potential
challenges and consideration of others that need to be involved and/or
informed to ensure a successful outcome (i.e. facilities, human
resources, IT). Communication with key collaborators is essential to the
success of the Priorities for Action and the overall planning process.
Q: Is it appropriate to include
Priorities for Action (PFA) for current activities that are not
adequately funded, such as additional responsibilities absorbed by
existing faculty/staff to meet a critical need?
A: Current
activities that have been unfunded (or underfunded) may be included as
priority actions requiring new resources, including additional
faculty/staff, if: (1) the activities directly align with the
priorities of the University/Division/College AND (2) evidence is
provided that the activities will be improved and/or expanded as a
result of the new resources. This will be an important consideration as
priorities are established in the resource requirements worksheet and
plans are linked to the budget process.
Q: How many Priorities for
Action (PFA) should be included in the unit alignment plan?
A: The PFA express the unit’s
contribution to meeting the priorities of The Talent Imperative!
The number of PFA will vary from unit to unit. However, a general rule
of thumb is to examine both the strategic priority areas and support
priority areas in The Talent Imperative! and determine which
priorities the unit can contribute to the most. In addition, some
priorities require action from all units. (See Appendix C for more
information.)
Q: What are desired outcomes?
Should desired outcomes be reported for each year of the planning
period?
A: Desired outcomes are the
expected results of successfully implemented Priorities for Action.
Great care should be taken in the development of desired outcomes as
these measures serve as indicators of progress and success.
The desired outcome should
be quantifiable and stated in specific terms. In addition, the
development of desired outcomes for each year of
the planning period is
strongly recommended to simplify monitoring and reporting annual
progress.
Q: Do all Priorities for Action
(PFA) require the completion of the additional funding requirements
columns?
A: No. Not every PFA will require
new resources. It is expected that the majority of the PFA will be
undertaken using resources already accessible to the unit through the
dedication of time and effort of faculty and staff and, in some cases,
the redirection of resources or the reallocation of budgeted funds
within the unit.
Q: Should requests for
additional resources be reported for each year of the planning period?
A: Reporting additional resources
by fiscal year is highly recommended to assist in providing a clear
picture of resource needs and ultimately linking the planning process to
the budget request process.
Q: The guidelines indicate that
WEAVEonline will be used to submit alignment plans. When will this
software be available?
A: Alignment
plans should be developed and submitted using the Word and Excel
templates in accordance with the timelines established by each Vice
President.
We are in the early stages of testing
the WEAVEonline software and given several other new software activities
on campus, we are delaying its use for planning purposes until December.
Once it is fully operational, training sessions will be scheduled to
provide a hands-on opportunity to enter the approved plans directly into
the new software. More details and a training schedule will be
forthcoming.
Q: Can revisions be made to the
plan submitted in Fall 2007?
A: Units will have an opportunity
to make revisions to the plan during Summer 2008 to coincide with the
submission of the first annual progress report due July 1, 2008. After
this initial year of planning, units will update plans every two years
in conjunction with the biennial budget process.
Q: Who should I contact if I have
more questions?
A: Units are encouraged to work
collaboratively with Deans and Division leadership. In addition,
Academic Units may contact Molly Tami (tamim1@nku.edu)
for assistance. Administrative Units may contact Sandi Gillilan (gillilans1@nku.edu)
for assistance.
Guidelines/Templates
|