3 hours credit
Tuesdays
4:30 - 7:15 p. m.
August 21 - December 11,
2001
BEP 204
>
"Providing for the educational needs of all students"
The College of Education will prepare exemplary educators who demonstrate the knowledge, skills, and professional dispositions necessary to provide for the educational needs of all students in a diverse and technological society. In assessing and evaluating mathematics, a reflective professional educator knows how to evaluate student progress in mathematics and how to modify teaching approaches to meet the needs of the students. This ability is grounded in a thorough knowledge of mathematics as well as knowledge of the current research and theories on assessment and evaluation. This forms the basis for theories and research on how best to teach mathematics to students of any age. These theories and research are reflected in recommendations from state and national organizations
The College of Education is aware of the necessity to support effective experienced teachers in each of the Experienced Teacher Standards (http://www.kde.state.ky.us/oapd/curric/TPGF/exp_teacher_stds.PDF) as established by the Kentucky Education Professional Standards Board. The objectives of EDU 658 are derived from the essential knowledge, established and current research findings, and sound professional practices as they relate to all of the NCTM Principles and Standards as well as the Kentucky's Core Content for Assessment, Program of Studies in Mathematics, and Experienced Teacher Standards particularly: Standard III (Designs/Plans Instruction), Standard V (Implements/Manages Instruction), Standard VI (Assesses/Communicates Learning Results), and Standard VII (Reflects/Evaluates Teaching/Learning).
The evaluation measures of this course will assess the student's understanding of these standards and his/her ability to apply these concepts to the teaching/learning process.
Professor: Linda Sheffield, Ph. D. Email address: Sheffield@nku.edu
Office: BEP 262 Phone: 572-5431
Office Hours: Monday 9:00 - 11:00 a.m.; Tues. and Thurs. 12:00 - 2:00 p.m. and by appointment
Homepage: http://www.nku.edu/~sheffield/
Blackboard.Com - http://learnonline.nku.edu. This class will be web-enhanced and all students should follow the Student Login Directions to enter the class on-line.
Texts: Clarke, D. (1997). Constructive Assessment in Mathematics: Practical Steps for Classroom Teachers. Berkeley, CA: Key Curriculum Press.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1995). Assessment standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Recommended: Ashlock, R. B. (7th Edition). (1998). Error patterns in computation. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Simon and Schuster.
Becker, J. P. and Shimada, S. (eds.). (1997) The open-ended approach: A new proposal for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Mathematical Sciences Education Board. (1993). Measuring up: Prototypes for mathematics assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000).Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
Internet Readings: NCTM Principles and Standards (http://standards.nctm.org/);
Kentucky's Core Content for Assessment (http://www.kde.state.ky.us/oapd/curric/corecontent/core_content_index_version_30.asp), Kentucky's Program of Studies in Mathematics (http://www.kde.state.ky.us/oapd/curric/Publications/ProgramofStudies/), and Kentucky's Experienced Teacher Standards (http://www.kde.state.ky.us/oapd/curric/TPGF/exp_teacher_stds.PDF).
Rationale:The focus of this course is on the use of assessment to improve teaching and learning. This includes the use of formative and embedded evaluation including diagnostic measures, observations, interviews, pretests, cognitive processes and connecting curriculum instruction and assessment as well as summative evaluation including standardized and criterion referenced/standards-based assessment and rubrics. Current authentic assessment techniques such as open-response questions, open-ended questions, performance tasks and portfolios will be included. Links are made among all types of assessment and state and national mathematics standards and core content.
This course places particular emphasis on the College of Education themes of intellectual vitality, assessment and evaluation, technology and diversity. EDU 658 specifically addresses the Kentucky Experienced Teacher Standards identified below (means of assessment noted in boldface).An * indicates an item that is acceptable for inclusion in the student's portfolio.
Standard III: Designs/Plans Instruction. The teacher designs/plans instruction that develops student abilities to use communication skills, apply core concepts, become self-sufficient individuals, become responsible team members, think and solve problems, and integrate knowledge.
Performance Criteria:
3.1 focuses
instruction on one or more of Kentucky's Learning Goals and
Outcomes.
KCCT Assessment Project
(project)*
Open-Ended Project (project)*
3.9 Develops and
implements appropriate assessment strategies and processes.
KCCT Assessment Project
(project)*
Open-Ended Project (project)*
Class Presentation (class assignment)
Standard V: Implements/Manages Instruction: The teacher introduces/implements/manages instruction that develops student abilities to use communication skills, apply core concepts, become self-sufficient individuals, become responsible team members, think and solve problems and integrate knowledge.
5.1 uses appropriate
questioning strategies to help students solve problems and think
critically.
KCCT Assessment Project
(project)*
Open-Ended Project (project)*
5.14 identifies
student misconceptions, provides guidance; and offers students
continuous feedback and progress toward expectations.
Error Patterns (class assignment)
Standard VI: Assesses and Communicates Learning Results: The teacher assesses learning and communicates results to students and others with respect to student abilities to use communication skills, apply core concepts, become self-sufficient individuals, become responsible team members, think and solve problems, and integrate knowledge.
Performance Criteria:
6.1 selects and uses appropriate assessments
Class Presentation (class assignment)
6.2 assesses student performance using the
established criteria and scoring guides consistent with Kentucky's
assessment program.
KCCT Assessment Project (project)*
Standard VII: Reflects/Evaluates Teaching/Learning
7.1 assesses and analyzes the effectiveness of
instruction.
Open-Ended Project (project)*
7.2 makes appropriate changes to instruction
based upon feedback, reflection, and assessment results.
Open-Ended Project (project)*
All students must have accounts for Email and WebPages on the university's mainframe computer to assist them in accessing the latest technology and to help them keep in touch with each other and the professor. In addition, all students must log on to the class at Blackboard.com for web-based course support.
Objectives
At the completion of the course, the student should be able to:
Student Requirements and Experiences:
If you prefer, you may substitute a project of comparable or superior quality related to the course objectives. Dr. Sheffield must approve your project before you begin and you must work out scoring guidelines jointly with her. This must be done at least one month before the assigned project is due.
This syllabus outlines the minimum requirements for successful completion of the course. Fulfillment of only the minimum requirements does not automatically correlate to superior performance. For a complete description of the requirements for superior (and other) performance requirements, please refer to the scoring guidelines for each assignment and the Graduate Student Handbook.
All assignments must be typed or word-processed. Handwritten assignments will not be accepted. NOTE: A separate reference list (in APA style) must be included with all final projects (KCCT Assessment Project, Open-ended Project and class presentations). All sources should be recent unless given for historical reference. Be sure to follow all copyright laws, especially those pertaining to use of electronic materials.
Optional
Students have the option of receiving a maximum of six points extra credit for one of the following activities (or other option approved by the instructor). Extra credit assignments are due no later than November 27, 2001.
Evaluation
The grade will be proportioned as follows:
|
KCCT Assessment Project |
50 pts. |
|
Open-Ended Project |
50 pts. |
|
Daily assignments, online discussions, class participation, etc. |
25 pts. |
|
Student Presentation |
50 pts. |
|
Final Exam |
75 pts. |
|
Total |
250 pts. |
Grading Scale
92% - 100% (230 - 250 pts.) A 85% - 92% (213 - 230 pts.) B 75% - 85% (188 - 212 pts.) C 0 - 75% (below 188 pts.) F
PROFESSIONALISM: Much of the following information has been specified within various categories contained in this syllabus. Professional behavior is expected of all students.
This course is part of an accredited preparation program that leads to professional certification. Students are required to demonstrate behavior consistent with a professional career. In particular, students are expected to:
Failure to demonstrate the above behaviors will have an immediate and severe impact on a student's grade. Consistent shortcomings in the above areas will lead to a student's dismissal from the Teacher Education Program. See the NKU and College of Education Code of Ethics for details.
The instructor reserves the right to make changes in the syllabus, and/or class calendar if circumstances so dictate.
10% of the original point value of an assignment is deducted for assignments that are up to one week late. Additional points will be deducted for assignments that are later. Assignments will not be acceptable after 2 weeks except in extreme instances
Cheating, plagiarism, and illegal copying of software will not be tolerated. This includes the unlawful use of material found on the Internet.
If an exam is missed due to an unavoidable situation, the instructor may allow a make-up. It may be different than the original exam. It may be written or oral. Any exam may be subject to oral questioning. You must contact the instructor immediately if an exam is missed.
Reference List:
Ashlock, R. B. (7th Edition). (1998). Error patterns in computation. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Simon and Schuster.
Becker, J. P. and Shimada, S. (3eds.). (1997) The open-ended approach: A new proposal for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Clarke, D. (1997). Constructive Assessment in Mathematics: Practical Steps for Classroom Teachers. Berkeley, CA: Key Curriculum Press.
Kulm, G. Assessing higher-order thinking in mathematics. Washington, D. C.: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Ma, L. (1999) Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers' understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
Mathematical Sciences Education Board. (1993). Measuring up: Prototypes for mathematics assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000), Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1995). Assessment standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Sheffield, L. and Cruikshank, D. (2000). Teaching and learning elementary and middle school mathematics. (4th ed.). New York: John Wiley.
Webb, N.L. & Coxford, A. F. (Eds.). (1993) Assessment in the mathematics classroom. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Professional journals/related publications:
NCTM: Teaching Children Mathematics
Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School
Mathematics Teacher
Journal for Research in Mathematics Education
Principles and Standards for School Mathematics: Navigations Series
SSMA: School Science & Mathematics
KCTM: Kentucky Math Journal
ISTE: Learning and Leading with Technology
(Several other publications related to special interest groups/topics)
Useful Web sites:
Student Information Form
On the form below, please fill in your name, email address, phone number and address. These will be kept confidential. Please sign in the space provided to acknowledge that you have received and understand the course syllabus. In addition, please sign to acknowledge that you are willing to have your work appear for professional development in print or electronic form.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name _______________________________________ Date ___________
Home phone number _________________ Best time to call _________________
Other phone number where you can be reached (work, etc.) _________________
Email address: _________________________________________
Please list all mathematics and mathematics education that you have taken.
I have read and understand the information contained in the syllabus for EDU 658, Assessment Techniques for P - 12 Mathematics.
Student Signature ______________________________________ (Do not print.)
Date _____________________
I give Dr. Linda Sheffield permission to use my mathematics work and/or photos for the purpose of sharing with other teachers and education professionals. I understand that this material might appear in written or electronic form, including booklets, disks, digital photos, and web pages.
Name printed ________________________________ Date ______
Address: __________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________
If you would prefer that your name not appear on these materials, please sign here. ___________________________