Communication Studies
552--Rhetoric of Women’s Rights Spring 2003
Instructors:
Beth Manolescu Office: 116E Bailey
Office hours: Mon. 12:30-1:30; by appointment Office phone: 864-9018
Email: bimanole@ku.edu
Jimmie Manning Office:1B Bailey
Office hours: Mon. and Wed. 9:45-10:45, by appointment Office phone: 864-3633
Email: jimmiemanning@yahoo.com
Course description:
The woman’s rights
movement in the United States is well suited for rhetorical analysis because,
almost without political, economic, or social power, women necessarily employed
rhetoric to attain their goals. This course will apply the tools of rhetorical
criticism in order to identify, describe, and evaluate the rhetors and their
rhetoric, thereby gaining increased understanding of how women sought to change
society through persuasion.
Objectives:
By the end of the
course, you should have a clearer understanding of the potential of rhetoric as
a change agency, and a thorough understanding, from a historical perspective, of
women’s struggle for their rights as people and as U.S. citizens.
How to achieve them:
(1) Readings
To help you to achieve
these goals, we will read and discuss select texts from the history of American
women’s rights rhetoric. Many of these readings will be available in Campbell’s
Man Cannot Speak for Her, vol. 2 (C), Flexner’s Century of Struggle
(F), and Friedan’s Feminine Mystique (FM); some will be available at
the Douglass site (http://douglassarchives.org/) (D); through Blackboard (log in
at http://courseware.ku.edu) (B); some through E-Reserves (log in at http://eres.lib.ku.edu)
(E); and through the Gerritsen Collection (available through the KU libraries
electronic resources page) (G).
Graduate students will
also read Campbell’s Man Cannot Speaker for Her, vol. 1 (M), Kraditor’s
Ideas of the Woman Suffrage Movement (K), Wheeler’s One Woman, One
Vote (W), and Condit’s Decoding Abortion Rhetoric (A).
(2) Attendance
To achieve the course
goals, it is necessary to attend class regularly. I will take attendance at each
class meeting. After 4 absences—excused or unexcused—your final grade for the
course will be reduced by 5 percentage points for each class meeting missed. If
you provide written documentation of excused absences on the first day you
return to class, I will make a note of it.
(3) Assignments
To evaluate your
achievement of course goals, you will have opportunities to demonstrate your
understanding of the rhetoric of women’s rights and your ability to perform
rhetorical analyses of select speeches.
Undergraduate students:
Exams: exam 1--20%; exam 2--20%
Papers: paper A--20%; paper B--20%
Quizzes and minor
assignments—20%
You will receive study
questions to help you prepare for exams.
Paper A will be a
rhetorical analysis and evaluation of one of the texts on the syllabus. It will
be due on the date we discuss the text in class. At that time you will present
your analysis to the class (7-10 minutes). You may choose to work
individually or in teams of 2 or 3. A detailed assignment sheet will be
available on Blackboard in “Assignments.”
Paper B will be a
rhetorical analysis and evaluation of a significant rhetorical text relevant to
women’s rights not discussed in class. It will be due on the date listed on the
syllabus; you will be randomly assigned to round 1, 2, 3, or 4. At that time you
will present your text analysis to the class (7-10 minutes). You may choose
to work individually or in teams of 2 or 3. A detailed assignment sheet will
be available on Blackboard in “Assignments.” All topics must be approved by
me. At least 2 weeks in advance of the due date, submit a proposal that includes
(1) your topic, (2) why it is significant, (3) full citation of the text or
texts you will use, and (4) full citations of secondary sources you plan to use.
You may use one of the texts in Man Cannot Speak for Her or another
text of your choice. If you choose to analyze a speech or written text, it
must be complete. If you choose to analyze a portion of some text, you must
justify your selection. Attach a copy of the complete text as an
appendix to your paper.
For quizzes and minor
assignments, your goal is to collect 100 points. It will be possible to collect
more. To earn points, you must take the quiz or hand in the assignment on the
due date. No late assignments will be accepted, and no make-up quizzes
will be given.
Graduate students:
Report on Condit’s methods in Decoding Abortion Rhetoric--20%
Research paper: 70%
Quizzes and minor
assignments—10%
The report on Condit’s
methods will be 5-7 pages.
Graduate students will
submit a research paper, 15-20 pages, suitable for publication in Quarterly
Journal of Speech or Rhetoric and Public Affairs.
(4) Collaboration
Those who prefer to work
in groups may choose to prepare and present papers in teams of two or three. You
will have opportunities to share your papers with other members of the class.
Each class meeting will also offer an opportunity to engage in critical
discussion of the rhetoric of women’s rights with your colleagues. You will
enhance your understanding of the potential of rhetoric for creating
identification and addressing conflict by studying the assigned texts before
class meetings--engaging the material by asking yourself what is being
said, why, and how--and by working cooperatively with your
colleagues during class to articulate and refine your responses to rhetorical
performances.
Tentative schedule of readings and assignments
|
Date |
Topic |
Reading |
|
W 22 Jan |
Course
introduction and introduction to rhetorical analysis and evaluation Early years |
|
|
M 27 Jan |
Woman’s
condition and early women speakers WOMAN SUFFRAGE Seneca Falls |
(F) chs. 1, 3, 4 (E) Barbara Welter, “The Cult of True Womanhood: 1820-1860,” American Quarterly 18 (1966): 151-74 (E) Susan Zaeske, “The ‘Promiscuous Audience’ Controversy and the Emergence of the Early Woman’s Rights Movement,” Quarterly Journal of Speech 81 (1995): 191-207. *(M) ch. 2 |
|
W 29 Jan |
Seneca Falls
Convention; “Declaration of Sentiments and Resolutions” and Stanton’s
speech at the convention Responses to antis |
(F) ch. 5 (C) ch. 5 *(M) pp. 49-63 *(K) ch. 1 *(W) Introduction, ch. 2 |
|
M 3 Feb |
Aftermath of Seneca Falls; Anti-suffragists’ biological rationale; Rose’s “Speech at the National Women’s Rights Convention in 1851” |
(C) ch. 8 *(K) ch. 2 *(M) pp. 63-69 |
|
W 5 Feb |
Anti-suffragists’ theological rationale; Mott’s “Discourse on Woman” Addresses to state legislatures |
(C) ch. 6 *(M) ch. 3 |
|
M 10 Feb |
Nichols’ “The Responsibilities of Woman” |
(C) ch. 9 *(M) pp. 87-93 |
|
W 12 Feb |
Stanton’s
“Address to the Legislature of New York” Conflicts in the movement |
(C) ch. 10 (F) ch. 6 *(M) pp. 93-103 |
|
M 17 Feb |
The great divorce debate |
(C) ch. 12 *(M) ch. 5 *(E) Charles Conrad, “The Transformation of the ‘Old Feminist’ Rhetoric,” QJS (Aug. 1981): 284-97. |
|
W 19 Feb |
Civil War and
13th, 14th, and 15th amendments; Anthony’s “Is it a Crime for Women to
Vote?” Sources of suffrage arguments |
(C) ch. 16 (F) ch. 10 *(W) chs. 1, 4-5 *(M) ch. 7 |
|
M 24 Feb |
Expediency: Willard’s “A White Life for Two” |
(C) ch. 17 *(E) Amy R. Slagell, “The Rhetorical Structure of Frances E. Willard’s Campaign for Woman Suffrage, 1876-1896,” Rhetoric and Public Affiars 4 (2001): 1-23. *(W) ch. 7 * (M) ch. 8 |
|
W 26 Feb |
Humanism: Stanton’s “Solitude of Self” |
(C) ch. 19 *(M) ch. 9 |
|
M 3 Mar |
Justice: Shaw’s
“Fundamental Principles of a Republic” Success |
(C) ch. 22 *(M) pp. 157-64 |
|
W 5 Mar |
Catt’s “Address to the United States Congress” |
(C) ch. 25 *(M) pp. 164-79 *(W) ch. 16 |
|
M 10 Mar |
Achieving suffrage |
(F) chs. 20, 21, 23 *(M) ch. 12 *(W) chs. 18-19 |
|
W 12 Mar |
Exam 1 |
|
|
M 17 Mar |
SPRING BREAK |
|
|
W 19 Mar |
SPRING
BREAK Feminine Mystique |
|
|
M 24 Mar |
Friedan |
(F) ch. 24 (FM) chs. 1-4 |
|
W 26 Mar |
Friedan ERA |
(FM) chs. 9-Epilogue |
|
M 31 Mar |
Steinem and
Schlafley Reproductive rights |
Gloria Steinem, “Testimony Before Senate Hearings on the Equal Rights Amendment, May 6, 1970,” in American Rhetorical Discourse, 2nd ed., ed. Ronald F. Reid (Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press, 1995) pp. 816-21; Phyllis Schlafly, “Testimony Before the House of Representatives on the Equal Rights Amendment, October 20, 1983,” in Reid, pp. 822-29.
|
|
W 2 Apr |
Birth control--Sanger’s “The Case for Birth Control” |
(G) “author” = Sanger |
|
M 7 Apr |
Abortion and
Single Mothers
|
Wattleton, Statement at the Thomas Hearings (B); Andrew Altman, “Abortion Rights: Beyond Privacy to Equality” in Arguing About Law (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1996), pp. 187-199; Stephanie Coontz, “Single Mothers: A Menace to Society” in The Contemporary Reader, ed. Gary Goshgarian (New York: Longman, 1998), pp. 431-435 *(A) |
|
W 9 Apr |
Women and pornography
McKinnon’s “Reflections on Sex Equality Under Law” |
In American Feminist Thought at Century’s End (Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1993), pp. 367-399 |
|
M 14 Apr |
Dworkin’s
“Pornography Happens to Women” Popular culture and women’s rights |
(B) |
|
W 16 Apr |
Radio and Music |
Gloria Steinem, “If Men Could Menstruate” (B); Holly Brubach, “Heroine Worship: The Age of the Female Icon” in Goshgarian, pp. 271-275; Loretta Lynn, Helen Reddy, Madonna, Liz Phair, and Ani Difranco (on CD distributed in class); Thelma and Louise |
|
M 21 Apr |
Film, Periodicals, and Multimedia
THIRD WAVE |
bell hooks, “Mock Feminism” in Goshgarian, pp. 255-261; Donna Minkowitz, “Xena: She’s Big, Tall, Strong -- and Popular” in Goshgarian, pp. 300-304; Zeisler, Miya-Jervis, and Hao, “Ten Things to Hate about Jane” (B); Feminist Majority, “Oppose Restrictive Dress Code for US Servicewomen in Saudi Arabia” (B) |
|
W 23 Apr |
Rodham Clinton’s “Women’s Rights are Human Rights” |
(D) |
|
M 28 Apr |
Graduate student presentations of semester projects |
|
|
W 30 Apr |
Course summary and review |
|
|
M 5 May |
NO CLASS MEETING--prepare for exam |
|
|
W 7 May |
Exam 2 |
|