Psy 210

Independent Research Project

                                                                 Guidelines            

                                               

A requirement of the Research Methods course involves conducting  an empirical research study in which the student specifies a hypothesis, reviews related research on the topic, collects data, analyzes it statistically and draws a conclusion about the validity of the hypothesis. The project may involve a scientific problem in any sub field of psychology- social, perception, animal behavior, behavior modification, abnormal behavior, etc. A written report of the research, worth 65 course points,  must be handed in at the end of the semester (on the last class meeting). The report should  be 8-10 pages (double spaced) and must conform to APA writing style (consult the APA Publication Manual (5th ed.) for details on style). A sample paper is on the hard disk of all computers in the Psychology Computer Lab. The paper is in a file folder named Dr. HoganÕs Psy 210 Folder; the document file is named ÒAPA styleÓ. Late papers will not be accepted unless a valid excuse is provided. A web site relevant to this project is at http://www.nku.edu/~hogan/irp.htmlx

 

Written reports must include the following sections:

1. Title page. A brief descriptive title, your name and course section and number appear on this page.

2. Abstract. A 50-75 word summary of the

 research  should appear on this page. The Abstract page must be inserted between the title page and the first page of the introduction.

3. Introduction. This section should include a review of the relevant  literature and a clear statement of the hypothesis which you plan to test. A good introduction can be written in 1.5-2 pages.

4. Method. This should include a discussion of the subjects recruited for the study and a detailed description of the method you used. The method can be any of several nonexperimental methods (e.g., natural observation, correlational study or case study, etc.) or an experimental method. A good Method section can be written in 1.5-2 pages, but depending on the complexity of the study the section can be shorter or longer.

5. Results. This section should summarize the major results of the study using descriptive and inferential statistics on the data. The results can be summarized in either tabular or graphic form, whichever is useful in conveying the findings to the reader. The results can summarize the results in 1 or 2 pages, excluding Tables and Graphs.

6. Discussion. This section should discuss the theoretical or practical implications of the study, plus any follow-up studies that you think would flow from the original one. This section should be about 2 pages.

7. References. This should include a list of all articles, books and documents that were cited in the body of the paper.  Approximately 8-10 references are appropriate for a paper of this magnitude.

 

Oral presentations.

All students must do an in-class oral presentation of their research. Within the brief time allotted (10-12 minutes), presenters must summarize the main idea of the study, the method, results, and conclusions. The class will have the last two minutes to ask questions or to provide constructive criticism. The oral presentation is  valued at 10 points. Everyone must do the oral to satisfy the course requirement.

 

Criteria for evaluating oral presentations.

Methodology criteria:

1. Development of hypothesis (discussed relevant background literature; hypothesis clearly stated; hypothesis was original).

2. Description of research method (procedural details were thoroughly described; sample size was appropriate).

3. Correct use  and interpretation of statistics.

4. Drew appropriate conclusion from design and analyses.

5. Critically discussed limitations and short-comings of methodology; compared and contrasted methodology and findings of irp with relevant literature.

 

Presentation style criteria:

1. Clear description  of purpose, findings and importance of the research.

2. Effective use of support materials (visual aids, handouts etc.).

3. Command of material (fielded questions adequately, discussed novel implications or applications of results).

4. Composure (maintained eye contact during delivery, appeared confident, prepared and relaxed).

5. Punctuality (used presentation time efficiently-neither too long, nor short).

 

Deadlines (see syllabus).